The notion of the Gaze as directed toward a seductive form implicates painting as spectacle, like in theatre or sports. Yet baseball is associated with athleticism and virility. Substituting stage for field, it is co-opted in my work. Draped in red silk, this subliminal fetish is transformed using luminous layers of paint into a feminine erotic odalisque.
The vanitas genre is also intended. Baseballs in various states of decay remind us of our mortality as do flowers, burning candles, skulls and other symbolic objects within historical context of vanitas painting tradition.
In a portrait, is the person knowable by making a painting of someone or by studying the image captured by an artist? If psyche is revealed, whose? Perhaps the viewer supplies what glimpse of soul there may be. Art history is loaded with great portraits. Elegance, angst, torture, subliminal beauty and humor. Edgar Degas. Lucien Freud, Oscar Kokoschka. Alice Neel, David Hockney, Susan Hauptman. David's Death of Marat is a most silent epic. The list is long and on it grows.
The artist must write with erudition what their work means. Gumming up the works, impulses to drop beautiful words into the composition come as naturally as a kid in a candy store wanting to pop delicious candies into her mouth. Describing my process is like explaining my dreams. It isn't simple. Influences on my work have been many, some of which I am aware, latent others bubble up to the surface in due time. Many artists say that they have no clear idea in mind when they begin to work, and that this is a good place to be. Discovery is what makes it vital.
Jasper Johns was recently quoted in the NY Times “To me,” he said, “self-description is a calamity.”
With that said, here are some vagaries regarding my work.